AstronomyAstronomers puzzled by 'planet that shouldn't exist'

Astronomers puzzled by ‘planet that shouldn’t exist’

-

- Advertisment -


'; } else { echo "Sorry! You are Blocked from seeing the Ads"; } ?>
Credit score: Julian Baum

The seek for planets exterior our solar system—exoplanets—is without doubt one of the most quickly rising fields in astronomy. Over the previous few many years, greater than 5,000 exoplanets have been detected and astronomers now estimate that on common there’s at the very least one planet per star in our galaxy.

Many present analysis efforts purpose at detecting Earth-like planets appropriate for all times. These endeavors concentrate on so-called “important sequence” stars like our Solar—stars that are powered by fusing hydrogen atoms into helium of their cores, and stay secure for billions of years. Greater than 90% of all identified exoplanets thus far have been detected round main-sequence stars.

As a part of a world workforce of astronomers, we studied a star that appears very similar to our Solar will in billions of years’ time, and located it has a planet which by all rights it ought to have devoured. In research printed in Nature, we lay out the puzzle of this planet’s existence—and suggest some attainable options.

A glimpse into our future: pink big stars

Identical to people, stars endure modifications as they age. As soon as a star has used up all its hydrogen within the core, the core of the star shrinks and the outer envelope expands because the star cools.

On this “pink big” phase of evolution, stars can develop to greater than 100 instances their authentic measurement. When this occurs to our Solar, in about 5 billion years, we count on it’ll develop so giant it’ll engulf Mercury, Venus, and probably Earth.

Ultimately, the core turns into sizzling sufficient for the star to start fusing helium. At this stage the star shrinks again to about 10 instances its authentic measurement, and continues secure burning for tens of hundreds of thousands of years.

Astronomers puzzled by 'planet that shouldn't exist'
Sound waves inside a star can be utilized to find out whether or not it’s burning helium. Credit score: Gabriel Perez Diaz / Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias

We all know of lots of of planets orbiting red giant stars. One among these known as 8 Ursae Minoris b, a planet with across the mass of Jupiter in an orbit that retains it solely about half as removed from its star as Earth is from the Solar.

The planet was found in 2015 by a workforce of Korean astronomers utilizing the “Doppler wobble” method, which measures the gravitational pull of the planet on the star. In 2019, the Worldwide Astronomical Union dubbed the star Baekdu and the planet Halla, after the tallest mountains on the Korean peninsula.

A planet that shouldn’t be there

Evaluation of latest information about Baekdu collected by NASA’s Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite tv for pc (TESS) space telescope has yielded a shocking discovery. In contrast to different pink giants we’ve discovered internet hosting exoplanets on close-in orbits, Baekdu has already began fusing helium in its core.

Utilizing the methods of asteroseismology, which studies waves inside stars, we will decide what materials a star is burning. For Baekdu, the frequencies of the waves unambiguously confirmed it has commenced burning helium in its core.

The invention was puzzling: if Baekdu is burning helium, it ought to have been a lot greater up to now—so massive it ought to have engulfed the planet Halla. How is it attainable Halla survived?

As is commonly the case in scientific research, the primary plan of action was to rule out probably the most trivial clarification: that Halla by no means actually existed.

Astronomers puzzled by 'planet that shouldn't exist'
If the star Baekdu was once a binary, there are two eventualities which may clarify the survival of the planet Halla. Credit score: Brooks G. Bays, Jr, SOEST/College of Hawai’i

Certainly, some obvious discoveries of planets orbiting pink giants utilizing the Doppler wobble method have later been proven to be illusions created by long-term variations in the behavior of the star itself.

Nonetheless, follow-up observations dominated out such a false-positive situation for Halla. The Doppler sign from Baekdu has remained secure during the last 13 years, and shut examine of different indicators confirmed no different attainable clarification for the sign. Halla is actual—which returns us to the query of the way it survived engulfment.

Two stars change into one: a attainable survival situation

Having confirmed the existence of the planet, we arrived at two eventualities which might clarify the state of affairs we see with Baekdu and Halla.

At the least half of all stars in our galaxy didn’t type in isolation like our Solar, however are a part of binary techniques. If Baekdu as soon as was a binary star, Halla could have by no means confronted the hazard of engulfment.

A merger of those two stars could have prevented the growth of both star to a measurement giant sufficient to engulf planet Halla. If one star turned a pink big by itself, it will have engulfed Halla—nonetheless, if it merged with a companion star it will soar straight to the helium-burning phase with out getting sufficiently big to succeed in the planet.

Alternatively, Halla could also be a comparatively new child planet. The violent collision between the 2 stars could have produced a cloud of gasoline and dust from which the planet might have fashioned. In different phrases, the planet Halla could also be a lately born “second technology” planet.

Whichever clarification is right, the invention of a close-in planet orbiting a helium-burning red giant star demonstrates that nature finds methods for exoplanets to look in locations the place we’d least count on them.

Extra data:
Marc Hon et al, An in depth-in big planet escapes engulfment by its star, Nature (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06029-0

Offered by
The Conversation


This text is republished from The Conversation beneath a Inventive Commons license. Learn the original article.The Conversation

Quotation:
Astronomers puzzled by ‘planet that should not exist’ (2023, July 1)
retrieved 1 July 2023
from https://phys.org/information/2023-06-astronomers-puzzled-planet-shouldnt.html

This doc is topic to copyright. Other than any truthful dealing for the aim of personal examine or analysis, no
half could also be reproduced with out the written permission. The content material is supplied for data functions solely.





Source link

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest news

See 6 planets in late August and early September

See 6 planets earlier than dawn Possibly you’ve already seen Jupiter and Mars within the morning sky? They’re simply...

Voyager 2: Our 1st and last visit to Neptune

Reprinted from NASA. Voyager 2 passes by Neptune, 35 years in the past Thirty-five years in the past, on August...

Polaris, the North Star, has spots on its surface

Polaris, the North Star, was the topic of observations by the CHARA Array in California. Polaris is a variable...
- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img

Understanding extreme weather with Davide Faranda

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRtLAk8z0ngBe part of us LIVE at 12:15 p.m. CDT (17:15 UTC) Monday, August 26, 2024, for a YouTube...

Must read

- Advertisement -spot_imgspot_img

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you