Footage of the spectacular coolant leak from the Russian Soyuz spaceship that came about on Wednesday (Dec. 14) satisfied a number one spaceflight security skilled that the craft is almost definitely not flightworthy. And that could be a big security threat for the inhabitants of the Worldwide House Station.
Tommaso Sgobba is the president of the Worldwide Affiliation for the Development of House Security (IAASS) and a former head of spaceflight security on the European House Company (ESA). Now formally retired, the veteran aerospace engineer who labored for years on Europe’s human spaceflight program spoke to House.com concerning the Soyuz coolant leak. His conclusions are reasonably damning. The Soyuz spacecraft, Sgobba believes, is “broken past restore” and will be unable to take the three space vacationers it dropped at the space station in September again house.
What’s worse, for the primary time in its historical past, the International Space Station (ISS) lacks the aptitude to evacuate all of its occupants in case of a critical incident.
“From what I noticed from the photographs, this was a large lack of coolant,” Sgobba informed House.com. “I’ve to imagine that the lively coolant system of the Soyuz spacecraft was compromised and subsequently, the Soyuz is not accessible for operation. It is my private feeling, but when it is true, now we have an enormous downside on the space station. We’re lacking the crew escape system.”
Associated: Soyuz capsule damaged by uncontrolled leak while at space station
No lifeboat for Soyuz crew
Russian cosmonauts Sergey Prokopyev and Dmitry Petelin and NASA astronaut Frank Rubio arrived on the ISS aboard the now-damaged Soyuz on Sept. 22 and are scheduled to return to Earth on March 28. Additionally on the station are NASA astronauts Nicole Mann and Josh Cassada, Japan’s Koichi Wakata and Russia’s Anna Kikina, who arrived aboard the SpaceX Crew Dragon in early October. That makes seven spacefarers.
However with the Soyuz almost definitely gone for good, solely 4 individuals would have the ability to get to security within the occasion that one thing goes flawed. This perilous state of affairs would possibly final weeks to months earlier than a brand new spacecraft may very well be despatched to the space station, based on Sgobba.
“This could most likely be the primary time that the space station has no full lifeboat functionality,” Sgobba mentioned. “The one factor that may be performed is for Russia to ship a substitute Soyuz however that’s not one thing that occurs from one day to a different. We must always assume that there will likely be a interval of weeks or possibly months through which this lack of [rescue] functionality on the space station will likely be a matter of life.”
Tommaso Sgobba is the Government Director and Board Secretary of the Worldwide Affiliation for the Development of House Security and former Head of spaceflight security on the European House Company (ESA). Now formally retired, Sgobba joined ESA in 1989 and labored as a product assurance and security supervisor for all European manned missions on the space shuttle, MIR station, and for the European analysis services for the Worldwide House Station. In 2004, he obtained a NASA recognition award for excellent contribution to the Worldwide House Station and in 2007 the distinguished NASA House Flight Consciousness (SFA) Award.
Rescue mission
So what precisely would the rescue operation appear to be? Sgobba believes that Russia would almost definitely ship two Soyuz spacecraft to the orbital outpost on the identical time. The 2 spaceships collectively would carry a brand new three-member crew.
Certainly one of these Soyuz capsules would then depart with the presently stranded staff, whereas the second would stay on the station as a lifeboat for the subsequent mission. The Soyuz spacecraft is normally piloted by two cosmonauts with a 3rd seat accessible for passenger astronauts from different companies or space vacationers.
Through the rescue operation, one of many capsules must make it to the station with just one cosmonaut on the helm. Whereas the Soyuz makes use of an autonomous docking system, Sgobba would not assume that the capsule could make the journey fully empty.
“I do not assume Soyuz can dock fully autonomously,” Sgobba mentioned. “I imagine that a minimum of one particular person must be on board.”
Dragon Crew will not assist
Sgoba additionally defined that transporting the stranded crew members on one among SpaceX’s Crew Dragon capsules can be troublesome, if not not possible. The explanation for that’s the lack of tailored space fits required for the Dragon spaceship occupants.
“Russian and NASA fits are made to accommodate a sure vary of human sizes,” mentioned Sgobba. “And so they have a system of strings that makes them match higher. However the SpaceX fits are tailored, they’re designed to suit completely completely or they’d not work.”
Within the wake of the leak, Russia called off two planned spacewalks, together with the one by Prokopyev and Petelin that was about to start when the leak began. This determination, along with the flaky look of the fabric spraying from the broken spaceship, satisfied Sgobba that the leaking substance was the poisonous coolant ammonia, which may pose a security hazard for crew members.
“These flakes of ammonia can connect to the spacesuit and you can carry them contained in the liveable surroundings of the space station,” Sgobba mentioned. “The warmth contained in the station would make them vaporize and that is not good as a result of ammonia could be very poisonous for people.”
Was it space particles?
With regards to the reason for the incident, Sgobba is inclined to imagine that the tank might have been hit by a bigger piece of space particles, though a valve malfunction can be potential.
“The leak was very large, however after all, it may very well be a leaking gas port or one thing like that,” Sgobba mentioned. “However as a result of the [space debris] surroundings is what it’s, I can think about that it could have been some type of a bigger object. Not a micrometeorite, as a result of the spacecraft must be designed to resist impression by small objects.”
Roscosmos issued a statement (opens in new tab) on Telegram on Friday (Dec. 16) writing that whereas the leak has brought on a “slight temperature change,” there’s presently no menace to the ISS crew.
“Modifications within the temperature regime are actually not essential for the operation of the gear and the consolation of the station crew, together with based on the experiences of the crew themselves, and don’t pose a menace to the life and well being of the cosmonauts,” the assertion reads, based on a translation by Google.
However, even if the space station’s operations aren’t affected by the temperature change, it stays unknown if the Soyuz capsule can fly. Roscosmos’s assertion doesn’t handle questions on whether or not or not the spacecraft is presently flightworthy.
Observe Tereza Pultarova on Twitter @TerezaPultarova (opens in new tab). Observe us on Twitter @Spacedotcom (opens in new tab) and on Facebook (opens in new tab).
