“The universe has at all times been barely bigger than what we are able to see,” says Virginia Trimble of the College of California, Irvine, an astronomer and skilled within the area’s historical past.
Constructing greater telescopes gained’t assist prolong the cosmos anymore. “Telescopes solely observe the observable. You possibly can’t see again in time additional than the age of the universe,” explains Nobel Prize-winning cosmologist John Mather of NASA’s Goddard Area Flight Middle, who’s additionally chief scientist for the James Webb Area Telescope. “So we’re completely restricted. We’ve already seen so far as you possibly can probably think about.” On the edge, we see the leftover glow from the Large Bang — the so-called cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB). However this isn’t some magical fringe of the universe. Our cosmos retains going. We simply could by no means understand how far.
Related: Where is the center of the universe?
In current many years, cosmologists have tried to unravel this thriller by first figuring out the universe’s form, like the traditional Greek mathematician Eratosthenes calculating Earth’s dimension utilizing easy trigonometry. In idea, our universe can have considered one of three attainable shapes, each depending on the curvature of space itself: saddle formed (destructive curvature), spherical (optimistic curvature) or flat (no curvature).
Few have championed a saddle-shaped universe, however a spherical cosmos is smart to us earthlings. Earth is spherical, as are the sun and planets. A spherical universe would allow you to sail into the cosmos in any path and find yourself again the place you began, like Ferdinand Magellan’s crew circumnavigating the globe. Einstein known as this mannequin a “finite but unbounded universe.”
However beginning within the late Nineteen Eighties, a sequence of orbiting observatories constructed to review the CMB made more and more exact measurements displaying that space has no curvature in any respect. It’s flat to the bounds of what astronomers can measure — if it’s a sphere, it’s a sphere so large that even our whole observable universe doesn’t register any curvature.
“The universe is flat like an [endless] sheet of paper,” says Mather. “Based on this, you possibly can proceed infinitely far in any path and the universe can be simply the identical, roughly.” You’d by no means come to an fringe of this flat universe; you’d solely discover increasingly galaxies.
That’s all nicely and good with most astronomers. A flat universe agrees with each remark and idea, so the concept now sits on the coronary heart of recent cosmology.
The issue is that, in contrast to a spherical universe, a flat one may be infinite — or not. And there’s no actual strategy to inform the distinction. “What may you search for to see whether or not there’s an infinite universe?” Trimble says. “No person fairly is aware of.”
So as an alternative, astronomers hope a solution can come from idea — a mannequin that would supply oblique proof by hook or by crook. For instance, the Normal Mannequin of physics predicted the existence of quite a few particles, just like the Higgs Boson, years earlier than they have been truly found. But physicists nonetheless presumed these particles have been actual.
“You probably have a superb description of the whole lot you’ve noticed to date and it predicts one thing is true, then you definately anticipate it’s,” Trimble says. “That’s how most scientists take into consideration how science works.”
